Jack Lindblad is running to win California's 39th Assembly seat!

The Green party was first introduced in St. Paul, Minn. in 1984. Many efforts such as a few campaigns for electoral office, philosophical discussions, and alternative institution building helped fuel the growth of Green Party chapters around the country. Alaska was the first state to ever archive a recognized Green ballot in 1990. The party grew from there on and after the 1996 elections the Green party formed the Association of State Green Parties (ASGP) who then, filed for national party status.  This party mainly focuses around environmental issues but they also focus on issues that deal with peace and decreasing the power of the corporation. The most recent action in the Green Party includes, Kent Mesplay, Jill Stein, and Harley Mikkelson running for President, Jack Lindblad running for state assembly...Jack Lindblad is running to win California's 39th Assembly seat!

39th Assembly Candidate Lindblad: Vote No on All ‘Ballot Box Budgeting’ Los Angeles Measures

Putting this raft of measures on the ballot, the City Council and mayor have relegated their duties to write the laws - to the public! Our elected officials want plausible deniability - failing to solve the deficit and to balance the budget.

The entire City infrastructure, system and it’s processes are unsustainable. For three years, since 2008, the City has been in a fiscal emergency. It’s getting worse. Foreseeable tax receipts are in steep decline from the collapsed property tax base arising from the financial, social and economic collapse putting people out of their homes on the streets. For the 2011-2012 fiscal year, $130 million less is expected than this year. The City faces a $54 million budget deficit this year and a projected $350 million deficit in fiscal year 2011-2012. The Controller anticipates the City needing to borrow $450 million in Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRANs) next year to cover cash flow. The City will be required to pay $628 million in debt service next year.

Several sitting City Council members, contested in this election, appear to leave tough decisions to the public by putting these budgetary measures on the ballot. Self-serving City elected office-holders, shirking their personal responsibility to perform obligations of their office, are trying to protect their ‘ticket to ride’!

The measures mistakenly base estimations of future tax receipts increasing. Vote No on Ballot Box Budgeting and No on All the Measures!

The Mayor, faced with escalating City budgetary insolvency and bankruptcy, shall be compelled to declare a Fiscal Emergency, that, under statue, will remove the effect of all or any of the Measures G, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, Q that pass. The City’s ongoing fiscal crisis makes this overloaded slate of measures trifling and irrelevant.

Police and Fire pensions are at issue across the country. Many jurisdictions make no draw on the public fund to pay the pensions. DWP and civilian workers are left out. Pensions account for over one-third of the City budget - at a level that sucks the oxygen out basic City services and transformation of DWP to renewable energy. This is a piecemeal approach, removes collective bargaining rights and casts savings over the horizon. New hires are to pay 2 percent of their salaries for health care while being guaranteed the same 90 percent pensions and benefits that existing cops and firefighters get. Slowing cost increases by limiting payouts to the new workers and encouraging them to remain on the job longer makes little inroads on the deficit moving ahead when it’s unlikely there will be a lot of new hires without biting into critical City services. Vote No on Measure G.

Of the City slate of ten (10) measures, the Green Party of Los Angeles County Council passed an endorsement for Measure H only. Heralded by it’s intent to bar contractors from contributing to political campaign and to edge closer to full public financing of campaigns so that citizen candidates with limited assets be given something greater than a slim to no chance of winning, the effect of the measure does nothing to contain independent campaign committees contributions and spending. By the lack of addressing the major loophole, Measure H fails to meet its intent of seeing citizen candidates less likely to lose. The measure has no application to contracts with DWP, the Harbor and Airport Authorities - departments with excessive contracts and big money contributions. Vote No on Measure H.

Council President Eric Garcetti and Jose Huizar caved in to D'Arcy (the same of the failed Proposition B Solar power grab) to slash funding for the OPA/Rate Payer Advocate by 75 percent from $4 million to $1 million and limit its ability to break down the DWP's wall of secrecy with access to full and complete information. The Office of Public Accountability’s requirements to be briefed by the DWP were stripped out. Implementation of this measure will be up to the Council to decide through ordinances, the same Council that waivered in the face of D'Arcy's maneuvers that took away power to evaluate all aspects of DWP activities: disclosure of water and power rate analysis and renewable energy progress in replacing the dirty coal-fired plants. Vote No on Measure I.

Measure J sets dates, timelines and procedures memorialized in the City Charter to prevent ever again the shenanigan from spring 2010 when the city illegally transferred $130 million in "surplus" water revenue to the general fund - not paying back ratepayers - increasing the transfer from "surplus" power revenue from 5% to 8% to the general fund -- a tax coming on top of a 10% DWP utility tax on every bill. The mayor sought to parley a 28% increase in electric rates and the rubber-stamping DWP Commission and leadership cooked the books to justify withholding $73 million in surplus revenue transfers to see the rate hike approved. The extortive attempted rate hike was held to 5% by a City Council fearing being defeated. Measure J smacks of a power grab written with back-doors and paths to not comply with the intent to legislate honesty. Vote No on Measure J.

Ruthless in their disdain for constituents and library users including many students, the mayor and Council so cut funding such that Los Angeles was the first big city in America to shutter its public libraries two days a week. The increase of the libraries’ share of the city’s property tax to 0.030%, phased in over five years, will not open libraries in the near term - due to the measure’s charge-backs:

"Beginning in fiscal year 2014-15 and thereafter, the Library Department shall be responsible for payment of all of its direct and indirect costs, which shall include, but not be limited to, health, dental, pension, building services and utility costs," the measure reads.

The flawed premise of eventual sustainable funding is based on property taxes rising as fast as wages and benefits, cost of resources, water and power, maintenance and all that the mayor and Council define as "direct and indirect" costs. Vote No on Measure L.

The tax on medical marijuana sales is fraught with legal inconsistencies. One, medicine is not allowed to be taxed. Two, California law disallows selling marijuana, only recovery of costs. No profits are supposed to realized. That’s why only non-profits supposedly are managing dispensaries. Third, the City is wanting to tax a federally unregulated, illegal substance to possess. Vote No on Measure M.

The “Citizen’s United” Supreme Court decision removed limits on the amount of money unions, corporations and individuals can spend on elections through independent expenditure committees so Measure N only brings Los Angeles City rules for city and school board elections into line with federal law. Whether it passes or not, the law is not in question. Rich and powerful people are able to spend unlimited amounts, effectively buying elections circumventing City limits on contributions of $500 or $1000. Vote No on Measure N.

After 100 years of squandering the allocations of oil revenues not collected, the expected revenue amounts to $4 million a year or 1 percent of next year's deficit. Next to no impact on the budget is realized by the measure. Measure O makes no earmark to transform the City’s energy generation to renewable sources. The measure allows the political process to dispose of the revenue on the desire of the elected officials. Vote No on Measure O.

Lowering the statutory 5% of the general fund that must be already held in an Emergency Reserve Account to 2.75% and a Budget Stabilization Fund be established. All bets are off in a fiscal emergency that even a lowered set-aside will not escape spending. Vote No on Measure P.

The mayor’s power is extended to exempt deputy fire chiefs from civil service, limiting the number of civil service applicants - increasing the potential for patronage abuses by eliminating the need for full and open examinations and the need to review all candidates seeking promotions in every department. Vote No on Measure Q.

39th Assembly Candidate Jack Lindblad Debates Incumbent Felipe Fuentes Today LA Mission College

Jack Lindblad, vying for the 39th Assembly seat, discusses his plan to bring jobs, quality education, immigration policy and a sustainable environment to the District, this afternoon at Los Angeles Mission College - Campus Center Main Conference Hall
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
PRLog (Press Release) – Oct 14, 2010 – Residents in the 39th District - from Sylmar to North Hollywood - deserve a representative in Sacramento who can say no to the special interests. Join Candidate Jack Lindblad in a Town Hall Meeting: Candidates’ Forum this afternoon at 3:30 PM, Los Angeles Mission College - Campus Center Main Conference Hall 13356 Eldridge Ave Sylmar, CA. read more

39th Assembly Green Candidate Lindblad speaks at Defeat Texas Oil's Prop 23 Neighborhood House party

Jack Lindblad will make brief comments in support of the upcoming global 10-10-10 March Against Proposition 23 and Texas Oil at Celia Pool's House, this afternoon, Sunday, October 3, 2010, 5:00 PM in North Hills California 91343.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Oct 03, 2010 – Join the Lindblad Campaign at Celia Pool's House this Sunday afternoon at 5:00 PM in North Hills to discuss the common ground of Lindblad's Assembly Campaign shared with the urgent need to defeat Proposition 23, funded with millions spent by the Koch brothers and Texas oil companies Valero and Tesoro to upend California’s premier climate change law passed four years ago, Assembly Bill 32. read more

Jack Lindblad on "Fernando Espuelas"

Candidate Lindblad calls for a Legislative Commission on the failure of mission in Californai's education system on Radio Espuelas on September 30, 2010.

39th Assembly Green Candidate Lindblad discusses jobs, education, environment on Radio Espuelas

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
PRLog (Press Release) – Sep 30, 2010 – Jack Lindblad, vying for the 39th Assembly seat on this November’s ballot, says that his presentation on Espuelas Spurs Debate at 5:00 PM, today, Thursday afternoon on AM radio 1020, will “focus on how three critical District concerns: jobs, education, and a sustainable, quality environment will advance once elected.” To honor that pledge, Mr Lindblad continues he will “fight until every person in the district who needs a job can get one, recapture our position as a world-class public education system, and make our region sustainable: in water, improving our air quality, and freeing traffic gridlock.

Fernando Espuelas' daily radio talkshow airs on 1020AM in Los Angeles, the number 1 Latin AM station in the market, and part of the Univision Radio network, and also online at espuelas.com. read more

39th Assembly Green Candidate Lindblad to address a failed political climate in Sacramento at forum

PRLog (Press Release) – Sep 27, 2010 – Jack Lindblad, vying for the 39th Assembly seat on this November’s ballot, says that his presentation will “focus on how three critical District concerns: jobs, education, quality of life and a sustainable environment will advance once a change of the narcissist political climate in Sacramento is reached by voting out corporate partisans. Being unaccountable to constituents while beholdened to Lobbyist interests explains Legislator's failure to live up to their duties and live within their means.”

Panorama High School, 8015 Van Nuys Boulevard, Panorama City, 91402 is the location of a candidate forum, today, Monday evening, September 27, 2010 at 7:00 PM. Meet candidates for the 39th, 40th Assembly, 20th State Senate Districts 27th, 28th Congressional Districts. Candidates for the office of Superintendent of Public Instruction have been invited. Ask questions; get answers! read more

Join California's 39th Assembly Candidate Jack Lindblad in a Town Hall this Sunday evening on the Beer Party's facebook wall

Residents in the 39th District - from Sylmar to North Hollywood - deserve a representative in Sacramento who can say no to the special interests. Join Candidate Jack Lindblad in a Town Hall this Sunday evening at 8:00 PM Pacific time on the Beer Party's facebook wall.
'The Beer Party began as a Facebook page, created by the husband and wife team of Chris Winland and Sara Prus, to express their outrage and disdain for the Tea Party, in all it’s lunatic fringe glory. It quickly gained quite a following, as thousands of Americans rallied to their call for more enlightened, common sense (yet far from timid) discourse.'

Jack Lindblad, challenger for the California 39th Assembly seat, is on the 2010 ballot

Free-Press-Release.com - March 21, 2010 -- Los Angeles, California - 39th Assembly Candidate Jack Lindblad received confirmation from the Los Angeles County Registrar that his 61 District-wide Green Party registrant petition signatures were valid, submitted in lieu of a filing fee, required for the candidate's ballot access.
Only this time there's a new twist: no Republican is running. read more

Green Assembly Candidate Lindblad Says "Governor Wrong on Cutbacks"

newsblaze.com — Assembly candidate, Jack Lindblad, said today that the governor's continued claims that voters do not want new taxes to solve the state's budget mess is wrong, and rewards the wealthy and polluters at the expense of the poor, elderly and sick. Lindblad wants a split-roll to assess businesses under Prop. 13.

Life as we know it is racing toward extinction

What would you do if you knew societal and ecological collapse was going to end life as we know it in 20-40 years? And how do you think a lot of other people will do? To do nothing is not on the table.

Forty percent of the earth's total resources have been extinguished by human activity.

Extinct or speeding toward complete extinction: Coral Reefs, Rain Forests, Human Habitat near Seas, 1/3 of all plant and animal species over the past 30 years, 1/3 of all remaining plant and animal species by 2050, 90% of ocean surface fishing.

Without an immediate and absolute cessation of mankind-produced greenhouse gases, irreversible Climate Shift-caused ocean-level rise, ice cap and glacial melt, accelerating desertification and rising temperatures are making the middle latitudes (such as Los Angeles County) too hot to be habitable by 2104.

According to a Los Angeles Times article on October 31, 2008, "State water deliveries could be slashed next year if California continues its dry streak, a move that could lead to widespread rationing. California Department of Water Resources officials Thursday said water agencies could get as little as 15% of their State Water Project allocations..."

Of particular concern to the 19 million persons in Southern California today, the region's carrying capacity can only provide water for 2-3 million people.

Revealing the local water crisis confronting the Los Angeles community
Without the Mono Basin, Owens Valley, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (all with reduced or no water stream flow forecast) and with the Colorado River being under a 500-year drought, a spector exists for a potential net out-migration of 16-17 million people without water and who must find and build new cities near adequate water.

Los Angeles County flood control engineers estimated upwards of 80 percent of storm-water percolated to groundwater prior to the concretizing of our natural river systems. Only 8 percent of rainfall in urbanized areas now recharges the groundwater, the rest along with urban contaminants flow to the ocean via the channelized streams.

Before suburban sprawl, the Tujunga/Pacoima Watershed was a major contributor of groundwater supply feeding the San Fernando Groundwater Basin—a natural underground reservoir that has become depleted over the years as most of the valley floor became impervious.

A third of LA County's total water recharge is attributed to snow-melt, and rainwater runoff which is collected in the upper watershed by Pacoima and Big Tujunga dams and infiltrated along the Pacoima and Tujunga Washes - comprising the total local surface water infiltrated to groundwater in Los Angeles County between 2003 and 2006.

Currently less than 15 percent of the water supply for the City of Los Angeles comes from local native groundwater. The other 85 percent is imported from distant sources via a delivery system that costs a significant percentage of our total statewide energy bill.

Revitalizing the Tujunga/Pacoima Watershed is key to a local solution of the Los Angeles water crisis
The two Upper Los Angeles River Area groundwater basins (San Fernando and Sylmar) are at a tiny fraction of capacity - with almost no infiltration. Impervious paving and long-term contamination have denied needed recharge to the basins.

If one-half the urbanized lower watershed is reclaimed to it's historic, natural state - using current landscape design methods (with 'Green Streets', non-polluting transportation modes and point sources) and advanced recycled water technologies, potable groundwater could be boosted five-fold or 75% of the city water supply. To insure a safe water supply, the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board have announced that Honeywell International, Inc. has recently begun construction of a wellhead treatment system for chromium in the North Hollywood region of the San Fernando Valley - Area 1 Superfund Site.

State and municipal declarations of drought will require reduction in water demand (particularly for landscape irrigation), expanded conservation and re-use programs, exploration of other water supply options, and increased reliance on local supplies. Climate shift implications for neighborhood councils have to do with being frugal, making sacrifices, planting and cultivating community gardens as neighborhood festival, being able to recreate by hiking, bicycling, riding a horse from our homes in the lower watersheds to the upper watersheds in the Angeles National Forest - in the process getting ourselves weened off the oil-based transportation infrastructure, weaned off the power grid by decentralized solar, solar-thermal, wind, and on-site waste recycling systems.

In a report just released by the U.S. Department of Energy that analyzed a scenario in which 20 percent of the nation's electricity is generated from wind power by the year 2030, the DOE noted that such a shift would reduce water use by approximately 8 percent. That's a significant savings, roughly equal to the average share of western water withdrawals claimed by urban users.

Then what would one do or advocate now given the impending urgency? Urban planning and design must be ordered by the watershed. One needs to insure that survival of civitas will be dependent on having local production of and access to (work, food, water, energy, shelter, goods, health care, education, culture). Bio-regional determinism (effected by this process of relocalization) will develop and define the watershed as the basic political governing, economic, social, cultural and currency unit where the grassroots govern from the bottom up.

Removing developers and politicians from the built-form development decision process
Payola politics between developers and politicians casts a blight on grassroots community development.

Removing developers and politicians from the land-use decision-making process is key to mitigating climate change-caused environmental degradation on the neighborhood level.

Once developers and politicians are divorced from the decision-making process of where, how much and what to build, gentrification fueled by payola politics will cease to block and counter the public interest, permitting a revitalized Tujunga-Pacoima Watershed to answer a sizable portion of the City of Los Angeles water needs as a localized solution to our water crisis.

Prudent land-use policy does not promote sprawl. Political opportunism must be dead-ended, as such was the misguided recent effort to gut and amend defeated legislation, in which the elected office holder accepted a developer's campaign donation in return for allowing the same developer to sponsor Assembly Bill 212 (to limit the municipal powers of the City of Los Angeles to control land use) favoring the same developer whose sprawling 229 single-family home Tujunga project would benefit from the legislation.

Respecting and seeing a renaissance of the watershed's carrying capacity presents a powerful argument for neighborhood empowerment to reject payola politics: the greed and corporate-personhood of the developer greasing the skids by writing the legislation, then profiteering from that legislation, after paying the politician, with both the developer and the compromised politician threatening, exhorting and coercing the constituency to share their viewpoints with bureaucratic layers of immunity provided by the one-party town politic.

Surely, once payola politics borne of a tryst between politician and developer is extinguished, dialog of communitas in the public forum around aesthetic, life-safety, and other community impacts will resurge and negotiation between all concerns will be voiced, but the nature of bio-regional determinacy will leave the decision-making about restricting sensitive, ecologically vital land areas from urbanization up to a map generating process of overlaying various map overlays of hydrologic, ground water recharge, riparian, chaparral, flora, fauna, woodland, forest, geologic, landslide-prone, seismic off-limits-to-urbanization preserves to be maintained for the overall carrying-capacity of the watershed.

Without human intervention, an emergent composite will reveal those least ecologically sensitive areas remaining as suitable for green-collar, 100% renewable energy source economic and built-form development.

Once crass developer payola-inspired politics are removed from the State Legislature, California can proceed to mitigate and cope with global warming and act to pull the human species back from the precipice of extinction. Payola politics does not allow adequate funding to restore our watershed and provide for a relocalization of our unsustainable, failed global economy based on the local production of food, energy, and goods and the local development of currency, governance and culture.

Reuse, reduce, repair, recycle, restore – have to replace the one-party town payola mantra of denial, distraction, disruption, distortion, and diversion.

Healthy watershed means healthy neighborhood means no payola politics.

- Mr Lindblad is running for State Assembly in our 39th District, has anchored his 26 year planning and architecture practice in the San Fernando Valley with his work being recognized for excellence and innovation. Mr Lindblad is also a long time Community Activist in the San Fernando Valley who is dedicated to protecting the environment, co-author and presenter of the award-winning Panorama City Commercial Area Revitalization Study which was codified into Los Angeles City Planning ordinance. He has given support to the formation of Panorama City and Valley Glen Neighborhood Councils.

Current 39th Assemblemember Fuentes entangled in campaign committee investigations and community uproar over legislative "gut and amend" deception

There is growing sentiment in the community to call on Mr. Fuentes to resign his legislative seat over the duration of investigations by the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the Los Angeles County District Attorney - combined with the additional neglect denying the District time and attention normally given to representing the District - now given to attorneys and defense strategies.
Only 16 months ago, after being elected to represent the 39th District, now Los Angeles City Councilmember Richard Alarcon relinquished his Assembly seat after just a few weeks to run for City Council. Community members are weary of having to struggle for representation held hostage by Mr. Fuentes' legislation-authoring developer cronies and his sporadic or diminished representation in Sacramento in these financially and environmentally dire times.

Concerned about the self-aggrandizing musical chair behavior of current office-holders, the electorate will opt to vote for commonly-held grass-root values that I share with the community and elect me to Sacramento.

State Democrat Pundits Bet on Payola to Win

One-party town, 'payola to the developer,' top-down politics may predict a lock-down win, but his opponent is a long-time architect and grassroots, neighborhood advocate, co-author of the award winning Panorama City Commercial Area Revitalization Study which has spurred pedestrian-friendly remodeling and face-lifting and is the one who has the name recognition and community-based reputation to win with a third of the votes plus one.

Run Jack Run. This contest is one Green Party Jack Lindblad will win!

Neighborhoods can help decide the State Assembly Contest

To insure a free and fair election in which each candidate can state their own case to the constituents, the 39th District's neighborhood councils (being grass-root representatives of constituents in the District) are provisioned to step up to the plate and offer forum for dialog with all of the candidates appearing on this November's ballot.

The hallmark of my term in office will be to do the neighborhood's bidding, to be the neighborhood's advocate in Sacramento for sensible growth, driven not by developers, not top-down, but rather from the bottom-up. My long-standing commitment to the community have been proven by my co-authoring and presenting the Panorama City Commercial Area Revitalization Study as approved by City government, assisting the formation of neighborhood councils, and numerous stances to insist developers conform to the community plan.

The issues this year are more pronounced than ever before - but more important, with my campaign getting the word out, the ineptitude of my duopoly opponents, my only opponents - will act in a big way to defeat themselves. The duopoly's all-out assault on working people - as witnessed by no-end-in-sight financial freezes, foreclosures, hikes in fuel, energy and food prices has fractured any voter loyalty to follow the Democrat or Republican. Those who have led us into oblivion cannot be trusted to lead us into our green future. We must 'hike up the mountain,' live closer to the land, conserve and be frugal. The path out of this descent to consumption-driven human extinction will be full of patriotism - making sacrifices, taking care of and sharing each other in the transition off the oil standard and forward to a green-jobs and 100% renewable energy economy.

The current office-holder has proven to be undermining the implementation of AB 1493 (Global Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act) - by not only scandalously allowing developers write their legislation to build more sprawl - but also evidenced by his fence-sitting which defeated Assemblymember Ruskin's 'Feebates' consumer credits given toward the purchase of energy-efficient, small cars from surcharging purchasers of SUVs. His political initiative to advance new small car purchases shows shows only a politically-expedient concern for his small car lobbyist.

Conditions in my Assembly election contest in 2008 are entirely different than most of those past contests which have brought us here. The one-issue message-framing republican will get 20-30%, and the democrat is not independent-thinking, but a freshman who employs payola over the public interest, and who in doing so, raises the ire of neighborhood council activists, other elected political office-holders and the rank-and-file constituent.

The Green Party does not (nor do I) accept donations from corporate entities. We favor banning of all corporatist lobbying and campaign spending with implementation of public financing of elections. Once elected, I will bring the ethical and moral imperatives of the Greens' Ten Key Values to Sacramento.

Solving the state budget problem: Issues & Green Answers critical to the 39th Assembly District - categorized according to Green Party Ten Key Values

Solving the state budget problem first requires:
ecological wisdom:
To slow global warming and stabilize our biosphere, what is urgently required is nothing less than an all-out effort worthy of last century's New Deal. The Democrats take on 'green collar' jobs is too little too late. As a human species, we must halt global greenhouse gas emissions and develop zero net energy technology; reducing is not enough.

The current officeholder has demonstrated an outright opposition to seriously address implementation of AB 1493 (Global Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act) - as evidenced by his fence-sitting which defeated Assemblymember Ruskin's 'Feebates' consumer credits given toward the purchase of energy-efficient, small cars in addition to surcharging purchasers of SUVs.
-----
Then, to stimulate consumer spending, cut prison spending, while actually increasing education spending:
decentralization:
Seeding a 'green collar' economy to provide for a workforce is imperative to maintain, grow and expand zero net energy building developments, affordable housing and innovate greenhouse gas-reducing technologies. By 'getting off the grid', funding will be manageable for maintaining and improving a smaller, more efficient infrastructure.

social justice, respect for diversity, feminism:
Reduce inflationary spiral on lower income workforce by a phased elimination of state tax on wages and salary and sales tax compensated with a graduated tax rate on gross rents, gross business receipts and resource-based taxes.

I will promote legislation to immediately end immigration raids and deportations. Political initiatives need to link every environmental demand to specific legislation that improves quality of life in our working class district – programs that employ youth in a living wage 'green collar' economic community (to answer challenges which cause gang activity), that create more parkspace (given the prevalent immigrant community's pro-environment health-conscious, wide usage of out-door public spaces and green recreational spaces), that extend opportunities for people to enjoy nature and to participate in green politics, that confront the immorality of a rich state while our children are poor.

The combined tab of nearly $15 billion for prison reform has dismayed lawmakers already faced with a $16 billion budget deficit that has prompted huge proposed cuts in spending on education and health care.

The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.

My opponent's legislative initiatives creates more criminal infractions which would expand the already runaway, double-digit billion dollar California Prison-Industrial complex. My green answer is removing jail time for victimless crimes, removal of 'three strikes' and using the expanded education dollar for educative, correction-oriented programs over punishment to reduce the size and uncontrolled spending of the current prison system. Fully fund educational programs, especially those for early childhood. Costs per student are far less than the cost per prisoner in a dysfunctional prison complex.

-----
Eliminate the deficit by stopping the War for Oil in Iraq and reduce military spending everywhere else, pushing Congress for our fair share given the Federal tax contribution - besides closing developer loopholes, seeding a green collar economy, while replacing the present dirty money, corporatist welfare legislation with Clean Money, publicly financed elections allowing single payer healthcare - saving 30% over the current privatized structure. After all, California is the eighth largest economy on the world stage and the actual savings will be immense.
community-based economics:
In an extended period of spiraling downward real estate value and economic depression, the mark of a civilized society would not to eliminate the 16 billion dollar State Budget deficit by closing parks, workforce healthcare programs, and entitlements to the poor, disabled, elderly and children. Instead, curb unsustainable speculative urban sprawl, mansionification through tax incentives by replacing tax on building improvements with tax on land. Change tax policy to close developer loopholes to provide for the common interest and to increase public coffers.

Prudent land-use policy does not promote sprawl. My opponent believes not, by beginning his term in office by gutting and amending defeated legislation, accepting a developer's campaign donation in return for allowing the same developer to sponsor AB 212, his proposed bill (limiting L.A.'s ability to control land use) favored the same developer whose sprawling 229 single-family home Tujunga project would benefit from the legislation. Justifying developers writing state law for their own profit, my opposition claimed the legislation's rationale was to protect developers from NIMBYism.

The move has riled Los Angeles City Council members (voting last month to oppose the state intervention in local land-use decisions), in addition to residents in Tujunga, La Crescenta and Glendale who have banded together to fight the proposed development and preserve the golf course. We need State Representation supportive of the local community. Green Party Member and tested leader in the community, Jack Lindblad provides that support, representing "We, the People" not "We, the Corporation."

California home foreclosures hit a record ^ ^ ^ Developer sponsored land-use bill ^ ^ ^ California foreclosures at highest level in 16 years

future focus/sustainability:

Redirect "Enterprise zones" (in which the City of Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency engages in real estate speculation while allowing growing blight in the community) toward attracting and encouraging transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly, mixed use, zero net energy, smart, compact, ecological-inspired architecture to reduce urban sprawl's carbon footprint and meet the 2030 mandated reduction of 80% - 90% of global greenhouse gases to mitigate global warming.

Fully fund an expanded number of Tujunga-Pacoima Watershed projects to restore riparian and chaparral areas - especially to clean up contaminated properties (closed landfills, and auto salvage yards) for green space (our lungs), ground-water recharge, potable water (to offset Delta and Colorado River water cutbacks), flood control, recreation, community gardens, horse, bicycling and hiking trails. Convert impervious paved areas to pervious.

Parks and recreation areas foster human development, strengthen public safety and security, promote health and welfare, bolster community self-image and instill a 'sense of place,' promote cultural solidarity, and facilitate community problem-solving.

Maintain the mission of Hansen Dam to protect urban development from flooding and promote small water retention ponds, underground aquifers and cisterns. Establishment of governance based on bioregional-determined ecological conservation, watershed-based economic, political boundaries. By doing so, we begin to answer the shifting Mediterranean regional climate, rising sea levels and temperatures, drought, and water shortage challenging the continued existence of 18 million Southern Californians, while providing this planet with a new model for governance and eco-mindful consumption.

Expand rail and jitney transit to compensate for the required trips now taken by private, gas-consuming vehicles - which will be phased off the roadways.

personal/global responsibility:
The incumbent has amassed an unknown number of 'hidden' campaign committees with unknown amounts of dollars. One might conclude that his legislative initiatives appear to be gestures toward nursing a corporatist money flow into his campaign committee treasuries. My green answer is to promote Clean Money and publicly financed elections to hold elected officials responsible and accountable to the people's interests, not corporate interests so that single-payer health care can save 30% off the cost of providing quality healthcare for all.

(from california budget project)
Who (and How Many People) in our 39th Assembly District Would Be Affected Under the Governor’s Proposed Budget Estimated Impact?
• 3,260 Low-Income Children Who Would Lose Medi-Cal Coverage Due to Increased Paperwork Requirements in 2008-09 - By: 2009-10: 5,940 Children.
• 2,300 Low-Income Children Who Would Lose CalWORKs Cash Assistance Through June 2009.
• 106,570 Low-Income Medi-Cal Recipients Who Would be Affected by Reduced Payments to Medi-Cal Providers and Health Plans - Loss of Funds: $21,616,000.
• 14,330 Low-Income Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Who are Recipients Would be Affected by Suspended State Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) for SSI/SSP Grants, June 2008 Through June 2009.
• 13,620 Children Who are Healthy Families Program Recipients Would be Affected by Reduced Payments: - Loss of Funds: $900,000
• 5,340 Low-Income Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Who are Recipients Would be Affected by Reduced Number of Hours Provided for Domestic Services in the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Program, 2008-09.
The Governor has proposed substantial reductions to virtually all state-supported services to close the state’s budget gap. The Legislature will consider these proposed reductions and other options during upcoming budget hearings.
Who (and How Many People) in Los Angeles County Would Be Affected by the Governor’s Proposed Budget?
• 1,544,710 students served by Los Angeles County’s public schools. Cuts to five of the largest funding allocations for public schools in the county would equal $670 per student.
• 66,140 low-income children dropped from the CalWORKs Program.
• 418,840 low-income seniors and persons with disabilities who would lose the state cost-of-living adjustment for Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment cash assistance grants.
• 163,700 low-income seniors and persons with disabilities who would receive fewer hours of services through the In-Home Supportive Services Program.
• 5,170 fewer children enrolled in child care and preschool due to funding cuts to child development programs.
• 61,590 low-income children in 2008-09 – and a total of 112,140 children by 2009-10 – who would lose Medi-Cal coverage due to increased paperwork requirements.
• 2,261,650 low-income Medi-Cal recipients who may have reduced access to health care
services because of payment cuts to health care providers.
• 249,220 children enrolled in the Healthy Families Program, which provides low-cost health coverage for children in low-income working families. The Governor proposes to increase family premium contributions and copayments and reduce dental services.
• Visitors to five state parks in Los Angeles County, which the Governor proposes to close.

Lindblad announces run for California State Assembly

Against the dire backdrop of what scientists are saying that humanity has until 2010 to stop unchecked global warming "before it's too late" to avoid catastrophic effects to the health and economy of humankind, Jack Lindblad is announcing his candidacy to be elected to the California State Assembly.

California's Assembly legislates for a state that (if considered a nation) would be the world's eighth-largest economy and twelfth-ranked contributor to global greenhouse gases.

The current Democrat officeholder in a mostly Latino working class district is not reflecting the urgency required of political leadership to transform our wasteful, consumptive society from pending extinction to sustainability that both Democrats and Republicans refuse to address in realistic measures.